risk
Rights violations from AI in law enforcement
Because AI for individual risk assessment, evidence evaluation, profiling, or predictive policing (Annex III(6)) operates without strict accuracy, human oversight, logging, and fundamental-rights safeguards, it can drive wrongful enforcement action, resulting in unjust detention, profiling harm, and rights violations.
Record JSON · Open in map · Data retrieval guide
Catalog revision: 24028ffcfc2b295fa1b08ee6caa84b765f0731b321496bf4f548c49ad2177028. A connection does not establish full coverage.
Attributes
- category
- ai_governance
- domain
- AI Governance
- Data Protection & Privacy
- Compliance, Audit & Assurance
- taxonomy
- eu-ai-act-risk
- inherent_rating
- high
Details
- risk_id
- ai-highrisk-law-enforcement
- category
- ai_governance
- likelihood
- low
- impact
- critical
- inherent_rating
- high
- treatment
- mitigate
- taxonomies
- eu-ai-act-risk
Source
No record-specific source URL is provided.
Connections
- UC-AI-04 — Assess impacts and classify AI systems before deployment mitigates Rights violations from AI in law enforcement
- strength
- primary
- rationale
- Fundamental-rights impact assessment and high-risk classification is the safeguard law-enforcement AI is faulted for lacking before deployment.
- UC-AI-08 — Log and monitor AI system behavior in operation mitigates Rights violations from AI in law enforcement
- strength
- primary
- rationale
- Automatic event logging and traceability is the mandated logging control supporting law-enforcement-AI accuracy and oversight requirements.