risk
Inappropriate human/AI task allocation and end-of-life risk
Tasks needing contextual judgment, ethics, or accountability are improperly delegated to AI; and decommissioning raises data-persistence in weights, loss of institutional knowledge, and service-continuity gaps.
Record JSON · Open in map · Data retrieval guide
Catalog revision: 24028ffcfc2b295fa1b08ee6caa84b765f0731b321496bf4f548c49ad2177028. A connection does not establish full coverage.
Attributes
- category
- ai_governance
- domain
- AI Governance
- Governance, Policy & Oversight
- taxonomy
- iso-23894-ai-risk
- inherent_rating
- medium
Details
- risk_id
- ai-inappropriate-task-allocation
- category
- ai_governance
- likelihood
- medium
- impact
- medium
- inherent_rating
- medium
- treatment
- mitigate
- taxonomies
- iso-23894-ai-risk
Source
No record-specific source URL is provided.
Connections
- UC-AI-05 — Set responsible AI development objectives and requirements mitigates Inappropriate human/AI task allocation and end-of-life risk
- strength
- related
- rationale
- Documenting intended purpose and constraints bounds what the AI is built to do, limiting over-delegation.
- UC-AI-12 — Enforce responsible and lawful use of AI systems mitigates Inappropriate human/AI task allocation and end-of-life risk
- strength
- related
- rationale
- Enforcing use only in accordance with intended purpose limits misapplication of AI to unsuitable tasks.
- UC-AI-02 — Define AI roles, responsibilities, and competencies mitigates Inappropriate human/AI task allocation and end-of-life risk
- strength
- related
- rationale
- Clarifying human vs AI responsibilities reduces mis-delegation of judgment/accountability tasks to AI.
- UC-AI-16 — Ensure human oversight of AI decisions mitigates Inappropriate human/AI task allocation and end-of-life risk
- strength
- related
- rationale
- The overseer's authority to decide not to use the system keeps humans in control of delegated decisions.